The one I am interested EF 70-200L/4.0 IS II vs 70-200 GM @200mm/F4.0 in TDP test. 70-200 GM is known has copy variation, and I am not a big fan of studio test in close distance on resolution chart but prefer outdoor test from distance to be more resemble in real-world usage. So just for reference. 80-200 f/2.8 AF-D vs 70-200 f/4. I'll admit this is a case of not knowing exactly what I want So I have a 70-300VR as my long telephoto on my D600. I want something faster. The 70-200/4 is intriguing and caused me to even make this comparison. Let's say the choices are new 70-200/4 @ $1400, new 80-200 AF-D @ $1100 and used 80-200 AF-D @ $750 F-Mount Lens/FX Format. Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/22. One XLD Element, Five LD Elements. eBAND, BBAR, and Fluorine Coatings. Show More. A popular telephoto zoom for a variety of shooting applications, this Nikon F-mount SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Lens from Tamron is characterized by its bright f/2.8 constant maximum aperture, as well as I shot on Canon APSC DSLR in the past with 70-200/F4 and now use D7200 with 70-200/F2.8. I reviewed my photos from last couple of years and there were a significant number at 200mm. The Fuji zoom goes only to 140mm. Recently, Fuji has 40MP bodies, which give crop option. That option wasn't available earlier. Nikon Z 70-180mm VS 70-200mm F2.8 Nikon 600 PF f6.3 vs 600 F4 TC vs 400 F2.8 TC Tuesday, 28 November 2023 04:33. $4800 vs $15500 - Is this a fair fight?? Nikon D750+Nikon 16-35mm f4 VR+Nikon 70-200 F4 VR+Nikon SB700 Tony Lau's gear list: Tony Lau's gear list Nikon Z7 Nikon AP-F 70-300mm F4.5-5.6E Nikon Z 14-30mm F4 Nikon Z 85mm F1.8 Nikon Z 40mm F2 +7 more BSLm. While I keep seeing that the 70-200 f/2.8 G2 is really good and a worthy alternative to the vastly more expensive Nikon versions, the f/4 version just looked like crap in the review. If you have the money for the Nikon, get that, or consider if you want the extra stop of speed from the Tamron f/2.8 G2. An extremely nice lens, one of the best ever made by Nikon IMO. My main reason for getting a 70-200 f4 would be for the lighter weight, and the VR would be an asset as well. . .but without sacrificing the image quality the 80-200 2.8d delivers. Of course, the 70-200 isn't a cheap lens by any means andthat's definitely a consideration. Focal Length Range : 70 -200 mm, Minimum Focus Distance : 3.28 ft. Optimized for capturing high-quality stills and HD videos on both FX- and DX-format cameras. Nikon's high-performance f/4 fixed aperture zoom lens. Weight- Approx-30.0 pounds. 20 elements in 14 groups (including 3 ED lens elements, one HRI lens element and lens elements with The 70-200 mm 2.8 will give me an professional grade lens in a range that I use very often. With the TC, it will also give me the extended range that I sorely miss for the occasional birding / fleet week / wildlife shooting / super moon opportunity. I am very tempted to go with this option. If Nikon made a 24-70 f/4 you'd probably see something similar to what people see in the 70-200mm f4 vs the 70-200mm f/2.8. For what it does, the 24-120mm f/4 is really a very good lens. The VR is excellent. However as others have suggested, if you don't mind carrying two lenses, you might be better off with the 24-85MM VR + the 70-200 f/4

nikon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8