Imo yes, the 24-70 2.8 is as good or imo better than any of the 1.8 primes. Kinda makes them redundant to be honest. Also, I much prefer the colors, contrast etc. From the 24-70 f2.8, even compared to the 50 1.2 Nikon's new Z 24-120mm F4 S is a standard zoom lens for the full-frame mirrorless Z mount, intended to offer a more versatile and cheaper alternative to the high-end Z 24-70mm F2.8 S. Providing decent medium telephoto reach, good close focusing capabilities and a lighter, more portable form factor, the Z 24-120mm F4 S should make an ideal carry If you see the charts, 24-120 is sharper than 24-70 from 24 until 50mm. It is little soft after 100mm but if the subject is close to you it's ok (portraits or spots). With Lightroom or DxO you can fix it. I am very happy from the VRii. I can shoot easy less than 1/15 handheld, and night landscape with 1/6. Make. I want a lens to do street shoot and carry around, I feel the 40 f2 will do. The 50 1.8 z is too large so out of the question. So, my question is, given my current setup, would you swap 24-70 f4 with the 40 f2. I will carry three lens every where. I know I will be happier weight and size wise with the 40 f2 (plus 14-30 and 70-300). Conclusion. The new NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR lens is surprisingly capable lens that delivers excellent image quality in most of cases. I purchased it after some initial reviews about its sharpness, silent focus, size and weight. It did not disappoint. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a metal mount. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR. Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/4 S. A metal mount is generally superior to a plastic mount as it is more durable. weight. K5sd6A. Unsurprisingly, the $2400 professional Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S is a better lens in most regards compared to the Z 28-75mm f/2.8. However, the cheaper lens holds its own in terms of central sharpness, vignetting, and distortion – even beating the S-line lens at times. The real advantage of the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S is corner-to-corner sharpness. The 24-70 f2.8S is quite literally a bag of f2.8 primes in the one lens. It has true professional performance as far as wide open sharpness, edge to edge sharpness, sharpness at all focal lengths, all apertures and all camera to subject distances. It has very nice bokeh and overall IQ. It is a remarkable lens, IMO. 24-70 F4 vs 24-120&解析镜头呼吸效应. 尼康Z24-70 F4｜嘿 又被你小子捡漏了！. 尼康z24 70f2.8与f4都是非常优秀的产品，适不适合你还得看自己的需求～, 视频播放量 83232、弹幕量 102、点赞数 893、投硬币枚数 113、收藏人数 171、转发人数 66, 视频作者 朱朱甍楹, 作者简介 The 24-70 f4 is probably sharper than most Fuji lenses, looks like an amazing lens. The 16mm 1.4 is not the sharpest Fuji prime though; it's pretty weak when compared with other Fuji primes such as the 90mm f2, 50mm f2, and 80mm f2.8. Good lenses are more than sharpness and this is why the 16mm f1.4 is so well regarded. I agree. I sold my 24-70 f/4 and replaced it with the 24-200. My impression is that it takes side by side pixel peeping to see the difference in the two lenses. Even then, it's really hard to see the advantages of the 24-70. When I feel rich I'd like to buy the 24-70 f/2.8. That would give me a superior quality zoom lens when it is needed.

nikon z 24 120 f4 vs 24 70 f2 8